Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Certified Adversarial Robustness of Machine Learning-based Malware Detectors via (De)Randomized Smoothing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.00392 v1 pith:ECKJMB7J submitted 2024-05-01 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords adversarialattackscontentrandomizedrobustnesschunksdefensedefenses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning-based malware detection systems are vulnerable to adversarial EXEmples - carefully-crafted malicious programs that evade detection with minimal perturbation. As such, the community is dedicating effort to develop mechanisms to defend against adversarial EXEmples. However, current randomized smoothing-based defenses are still vulnerable to attacks that inject blocks of adversarial content. In this paper, we introduce a certifiable defense against patch attacks that guarantees, for a given executable and an adversarial patch size, no adversarial EXEmple exist. Our method is inspired by (de)randomized smoothing which provides deterministic robustness certificates. During training, a base classifier is trained using subsets of continguous bytes. At inference time, our defense splits the executable into non-overlapping chunks, classifies each chunk independently, and computes the final prediction through majority voting to minimize the influence of injected content. Furthermore, we introduce a preprocessing step that fixes the size of the sections and headers to a multiple of the chunk size. As a consequence, the injected content is confined to an integer number of chunks without tampering the other chunks containing the real bytes of the input examples, allowing us to extend our certified robustness guarantees to content insertion attacks. We perform an extensive ablation study, by comparing our defense with randomized smoothing-based defenses against a plethora of content manipulation attacks and neural network architectures. Results show that our method exhibits unmatched robustness against strong content-insertion attacks, outperforming randomized smoothing-based defenses in the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EXE-Bench: Ranking the Tradeoffs of AI-based Windows Malware Detectors for Real-World Usability

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under a unified four-axis benchmark, EMBER feature-based GBDT outperforms end-to-end deep malware detectors on the joint tradeoff of accuracy, temporal stability, adversarial robustness, and inference cost.

  2. Evaluating the Vulnerability of ML-Based Ethereum Phishing Detectors to Single-Feature Adversarial Perturbations

    cs.CR 2025-04 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Simple single-feature perturbations, such as shifted timestamps and altered values, sharply reduce the accuracy of Random Forest, Decision Tree, and KNN Ethereum phishing detectors, with adversarial training reported ...

Pith tools