Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Untangling Knots: Leveraging LLM for Error Resolution in Computational Notebooks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.01559 v1 pith:Z2KMFS5K submitted 2024-03-26 cs.SE cs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.LG
keywords computationalnotebookstoolshoweverapproachbugsdevelopmentpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Computational notebooks became indispensable tools for research-related development, offering unprecedented interactivity and flexibility in the development process. However, these benefits come at the cost of reproducibility and an increased potential for bugs. There are many tools for bug fixing; however, they are generally targeted at the classical linear code. With the rise of code-fluent Large Language Models, a new stream of smart bug-fixing tools has emerged. However, the applicability of those tools is still problematic for non-linear computational notebooks. In this paper, we propose a potential solution for resolving errors in computational notebooks via an iterative LLM-based agent. We discuss the questions raised by this approach and share a novel dataset of computational notebooks containing bugs to facilitate the research of the proposed approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CXXCrafter: An LLM-Based Agent for Automated C/C++ Open Source Software Building

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven agent, CXXCrafter, automatically builds 587 of 752 C/C++ open-source projects (78%), beating default build commands (39%) and bare LLMs (32 to 38%).

Pith tools