Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Context Steering: Controllable Personalization at Inference Time

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.01768 v3 pith:GDRQMSWK submitted 2024-05-02 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords contextdifferentinfluencemodelpersonalizedresponsesspecificcontextual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To deliver high-quality, personalized responses, large language models (LLMs) must effectively incorporate context -- personal, demographic, and cultural information specific to an end-user. For example, asking the model to explain Newton's second law with the context "I am a toddler" should produce a response different from when the context is "I am a physics professor". However, leveraging the context in practice is a nuanced and challenging task, and is often dependent on the specific situation or user base. The model must strike a balance between providing specific, personalized responses and maintaining general applicability. Current solutions, such as prompt-engineering and fine-tuning, require collection of contextually appropriate responses as examples, making them time-consuming and less flexible to use across different contexts. In this work, we introduce Context Steering (CoS) -- a simple, training-free decoding approach that amplifies the influence of the context in next token predictions. CoS computes contextual influence by comparing the output probabilities from two LLM forward passes: one that includes the context and one that does not. By linearly scaling the contextual influence, CoS allows practitioners to flexibly control the degree of personalization for different use cases. We show that CoS can be applied to autoregressive LLMs, and demonstrates strong performance in personalized recommendations. Additionally, we show that CoS can function as a Bayesian Generative model to infer and quantify correlations between open-ended texts, broadening its potential applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Words to Widgets for Controllable LLM Generation

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Reifying ad-hoc preference phrases as GUI widgets, steered by log-probability modulation at decode time, improves precision and perceived control of LLM writing over natural-language prompting alone.

  2. Neuron-Level Differentiation of Memorization and Generalization in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Memorization and generalization in LLMs are associated with distinct neurons, and steering those neurons at inference time can switch a model between the two behaviors.

  3. On the Way to LLM Personalization: Learning to Remember User Conversations

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finetuning a LoRA adapter on self-generated question-answer pairs lets Llama 3 8B recall conversation topics with 81.5% accuracy, close to RAG at 83.5% but without retrieval.

  4. Evaluating the Prompt Steerability of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A formal benchmark with steerability indices shows that six open-weight LLMs are only partially steerable by prompting, with strong baseline skew and directional asymmetry.

  5. PrefReward: Learning User Preference Matrix for Personalized Text Generation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    PrefReward selects the most style-aligned LLM output via a KL-divergence reward against an explicit user preference matrix, beating retrieval baselines on LongLaMP.

Pith tools