Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Learning under Imitative Strategic Behavior with Unforeseeable Outcomes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.01797 v2 pith:T5ADHXOI submitted 2024-05-03 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords decision-makerindividualsoutcomesbehaviorbehaviorsfeatureslabelsthey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning systems have been widely used to make decisions about individuals who may behave strategically to receive favorable outcomes, e.g., they may genuinely improve the true labels or manipulate observable features directly to game the system without changing labels. Although both behaviors have been studied (often as two separate problems) in the literature, most works assume individuals can (i) perfectly foresee the outcomes of their behaviors when they best respond; (ii) change their features arbitrarily as long as it is affordable, and the costs they need to pay are deterministic functions of feature changes. In this paper, we consider a different setting and focus on imitative strategic behaviors with unforeseeable outcomes, i.e., individuals manipulate/improve by imitating the features of those with positive labels, but the induced feature changes are unforeseeable. We first propose a Stackelberg game to model the interplay between individuals and the decision-maker, under which we examine how the decision-maker's ability to anticipate individual behavior affects its objective function and the individual's best response. We show that the objective difference between the two can be decomposed into three interpretable terms, with each representing the decision-maker's preference for a certain behavior. By exploring the roles of each term, we theoretically illustrate how a decision-maker with adjusted preferences may simultaneously disincentivize manipulation, incentivize improvement, and promote fairness. Such theoretical results provide a guideline for decision-makers to inform better and socially responsible decisions in practice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Linear Strategic Classification with Endogenous Improvements

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    In a linear strategic-classification model where manipulation can genuinely improve outcomes, the optimal strategic classifier is a parallel shift of the Bayes boundary, and it is a provably better proxy for the impro...

  2. Explanation Design in Strategic Learning: Sufficient Explanations that Induce Non-harmful Responses

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under a conditional homogeneity assumption, action recommendation-based explanations are sufficient to guarantee that strategic agents do not harm their own utility.

Pith tools