Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards a Formal Creativity Theory: Preliminary results in Novelty and Transformativeness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.02148 v1 pith:NUKPNHUC submitted 2024-05-03 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords creativityformalnoveltytransformationallearningtheorybehaviourconcepts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Formalizing creativity-related concepts has been a long-term goal of Computational Creativity. To the same end, we explore Formal Learning Theory in the context of creativity. We provide an introduction to the main concepts of this framework and a re-interpretation of terms commonly found in creativity discussions, proposing formal definitions for novelty and transformational creativity. This formalisation marks the beginning of a research branch we call Formal Creativity Theory, exploring how learning can be included as preparation for exploratory behaviour and how learning is a key part of transformational creative behaviour. By employing these definitions, we argue that, while novelty is neither necessary nor sufficient for transformational creativity in general, when using an inspiring set, rather than a sequence of experiences, an agent actually requires novelty for transformational creativity to occur.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transformational Creativity in Science: A Graphical Theory

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Scientific conceptual spaces are formalized as DAGs, and a proof shows that modifying axioms, the sink nodes, has maximal transformative potential.

Pith tools