Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

What does the Knowledge Neuron Thesis Have to do with Knowledge?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.02421 v1 pith:WQFR6LPT submitted 2024-05-03 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgethesismodelweightscomplexcomprehensivecorpusediting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We reassess the Knowledge Neuron (KN) Thesis: an interpretation of the mechanism underlying the ability of large language models to recall facts from a training corpus. This nascent thesis proposes that facts are recalled from the training corpus through the MLP weights in a manner resembling key-value memory, implying in effect that "knowledge" is stored in the network. Furthermore, by modifying the MLP modules, one can control the language model's generation of factual information. The plausibility of the KN thesis has been demonstrated by the success of KN-inspired model editing methods (Dai et al., 2022; Meng et al., 2022). We find that this thesis is, at best, an oversimplification. Not only have we found that we can edit the expression of certain linguistic phenomena using the same model editing methods but, through a more comprehensive evaluation, we have found that the KN thesis does not adequately explain the process of factual expression. While it is possible to argue that the MLP weights store complex patterns that are interpretable both syntactically and semantically, these patterns do not constitute "knowledge." To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the knowledge representation process, we must look beyond the MLP weights and explore recent models' complex layer structures and attention mechanisms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. COMPKE: Complex Question Answering under Knowledge Editing

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    COMPKE is a new benchmark with 11,924 complex questions that tests knowledge editing through one-to-many relations and logical operations, where existing editing methods often fail.

  2. Understanding Gated Neurons in Transformers from Their Input-Output Functionality

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 12 language models, neurons in early-middle layers tend to add the direction they detect (enrichment), while later layers tend to reduce it (depletion), based on input-output weight cosine similarity.

  3. Neural Incompatibility: The Unbridgeable Gap of Cross-Scale Parametric Knowledge Transfer in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Directly transferring parameters between differently-sized language models is unreliable; the paper proposes a pre-alignment method (LaTen) and explains the failure via 'Neural Incompatibility'.

Pith tools