Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Wobbling motion in triaxial nuclei

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.02747 v2 pith:ZE2WVV3K submitted 2024-05-04 nucl-th nucl-ex

classification nucl-thnucl-ex
keywords triaxialmodelquasiparticlewobblingdiscussedrotormeansmicroscopic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The experimental evidence for the collective wobbling motion of triaxial nuclei is reviewed. The classification into transverse and longitudinal in the presence of quasiparticle excitations is discussed. The description by means of the quasiparticle+triaxial rotor model is discussed in detail. The structure of the states is analyzed using the spin-coherent-state and spin-squeezed-state representations of the reduced density matrices of the total and particle angular momenta, which distill the corresponding classical precessional motions. Various approximate solutions of the quasiparticle+triaxial rotor model are evaluated. The microscopic studies of wobbling in the small-amplitude random phase approximation are discussed. Selected studies of wobbling by means of the triaxial projected shell model are presented, which focus on how this microscopic approach removes certain deficiencies of the semi-microscopic quasiparticle+triaxial rotor model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Quantum Simulation of Rotating Nuclei using Quantum Variational Algorithms

    nucl-th 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    VQE on small CNS-inspired nuclear models matches exact diagonalization only in the simplest cases, with errors up to 1.09 in the 8-qubit models, despite the abstract claiming errors below 1e-4.

Pith tools