Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Searches for the BSM scenarios at the LHC using decision tree based machine learning algorithms: A comparative study and review of Random Forest, Adaboost, XGboost and LightGBM frameworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06040 v2 pith:HDHHJHGX submitted 2024-05-09 hep-ph hep-exphysics.comp-ph

classification hep-phhep-exphysics.comp-ph
keywords algorithmsdecisiontexttttreehighlearningmachineadaboost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning algorithms are now being extensively used in our daily lives, spanning across diverse industries as well as academia. In the field of high energy physics (HEP), the most common and challenging task is separating a rare signal from a much larger background. The boosted decision tree (BDT) algorithm has been a cornerstone of the high energy physics for analyzing event triggering, particle identification, jet tagging, object reconstruction, event classification, and other related tasks for quite some time. This article presents a comprehensive overview of research conducted by both HEP experimental and phenomenological groups that utilize decision tree algorithms in the context of the Standard Model and Supersymmetry (SUSY). We also summarize the basic concept of machine learning and decision tree algorithm along with the working principle of \texttt{Random Forest}, \texttt{AdaBoost} and two gradient boosting frameworks, such as \texttt{XGBoost}, and \texttt{LightGBM}. Using a case study of electroweakino productions at the high luminosity LHC, we demonstrate how these algorithms lead to improvement in the search sensitivity compared to traditional cut-based methods in both compressed and non-compressed R-parity conserving SUSY scenarios. The effect of different hyperparameters and their optimization, feature importance study using SHapley values are also discussed in detail.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Machine Learning Architectures for ttH Multilepton Signal Sensitivity

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A controlled benchmark of six ML classifiers on a new simulated ttH multilepton dataset finds symmetry-constrained graph models (Particle Transformer, LorentzNet) and azimuthal RoPE encoding outperform tabular baselines.

  2. Multiboson Signatures of Doubly Charged Scalars at a Same-Sign Muon Collider

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A same-sign muon collider at 2 TeV with 1 ab^-1 could reach 2-sigma sensitivity to Type-II seesaw doubly charged scalars decaying to WW up to roughly 425-430 GeV, slightly extending current LHC coverage.

  3. Vector Boson Fusion Signatures of Superheavy Majorana Neutrinos at Muon Colliders

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Future muon colliders could probe heavy Majorana neutrino masses via t-channel vector boson fusion, with projected exclusions in the (mass, mixing) plane from cut-based and BDT analyses.

Pith tools