Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

LLM Discussion: Enhancing the Creativity of Large Language Models via Discussion Framework and Role-Play

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06373 v4 pith:OLVCE22V submitted 2024-05-10 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords creativitydiscussionframeworktestlanguagellmscreativehuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional proficiency in natural language processing but often fall short of generating creative and original responses to open-ended questions. To enhance LLM creativity, our key insight is to emulate the human process of inducing collective creativity through engaging discussions with participants from diverse backgrounds and perspectives. To this end, we propose LLM Discussion, a three-phase discussion framework that facilitates vigorous and diverging idea exchanges and ensures convergence to creative answers. Moreover, we adopt a role-playing technique by assigning distinct roles to LLMs to combat the homogeneity of LLMs. We evaluate the efficacy of the proposed framework with the Alternative Uses Test, Similarities Test, Instances Test, and Scientific Creativity Test through both LLM evaluation and human study. The results show that our proposed framework outperforms single-LLM approaches and existing multi-LLM frameworks across various creativity metrics. The code is available at https://github.com/lawraa/LLM-Discussion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 141 papers derives a three-axis taxonomy of multi-agent debate design (participants, interaction, agreement) and shows the field has converged on a narrow default pattern.

  2. ORPP: Self-Optimizing Role-playing Prompts to Enhance Language Model Capabilities

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ORPP generates task-specific role-playing prompts through iterative reward-model-guided optimization on a small sample, then uses few-shot transfer to create prompts for new questions.

  3. Evaluation Hallucination in Multi-Round Incomplete Information Lateral-Driven Reasoning Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-as-judge scoring of multi-round lateral thinking tasks can be fooled by answer leakage and question substitution, so response-based metrics may overstate reasoning ability.

  4. AI Agent Behavioral Science

    q-bio.NC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI agents should be studied as behavioral entities shaped by context and interaction, not only as trained models.

  5. Transport properties of baryon rich back-reacted thermal plasma with finite 't Hooft coupling correction

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    In a charged AdS black hole with Gauss-Bonnet and string-cloud corrections, drag force and jet quenching rise with GB coupling and baryon/flavor density while screening length falls; rotating-quark energy loss is supp...

Pith tools