REVIEW 4 cited by
Reinformer: Max-Return Sequence Modeling for Offline RL
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As a data-driven paradigm, offline reinforcement learning (RL) has been formulated as sequence modeling that conditions on the hindsight information including returns, goal or future trajectory. Although promising, this supervised paradigm overlooks the core objective of RL that maximizes the return. This overlook directly leads to the lack of trajectory stitching capability that affects the sequence model learning from sub-optimal data. In this work, we introduce the concept of max-return sequence modeling which integrates the goal of maximizing returns into existing sequence models. We propose Reinforced Transformer (Reinformer), indicating the sequence model is reinforced by the RL objective. Reinformer additionally incorporates the objective of maximizing returns in the training phase, aiming to predict the maximum future return within the distribution. During inference, this in-distribution maximum return will guide the selection of optimal actions. Empirically, Reinformer is competitive with classical RL methods on the D4RL benchmark and outperforms state-of-the-art sequence model particularly in trajectory stitching ability. Code is public at https://github.com/Dragon-Zhuang/Reinformer.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Efficient Online RL Fine Tuning with Offline Pre-trained Policy Only
PORL fine-tunes a pre-trained policy online by first collecting epsilon-greedy interaction data and learning a fresh Q-function from scratch, removing the need for pre-trained critics or offline data.
-
ReBRAC-v2: The Return of the King
A fixed-recipe offline RL method combining normalizing-flow actors, categorical critics, staged training, and test-time refinement beats recent flow-based baselines by 22.5 points averaged over ten OGBench categories.
-
Balancing Signal and Variance: Adaptive Offline RL Post-Training for VLA Flow Models
ARFM adaptively adjusts a scaling factor in the flow-matching loss so that offline RL advantage signals are preserved while gradient variance is controlled, improving VLA robot policy fine-tuning.
-
Closing the Gap between TD Learning and Supervised Learning with $Q$-Conditioned Maximization
GCReinSL adds Q-conditioned maximization to supervised offline RL, using normalizing flows to estimate goal-reaching probabilities and expectile regression to condition actions on the best in-distribution value, impro...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.