Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Medical Dialogue: A Survey of Categories, Methods, Evaluation and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.10630 v1 pith:B42Z3FSJ submitted 2024-05-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords medicalsystemsdialogdialoguelanguageapplicationcategorieschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper surveys and organizes research works on medical dialog systems, which is an important yet challenging task. Although these systems have been surveyed in the medical community from an application perspective, a systematic review from a rigorous technical perspective has to date remained noticeably absent. As a result, an overview of the categories, methods, and evaluation of medical dialogue systems remain limited and underspecified, hindering the further improvement of this area. To fill this gap, we investigate an initial pool of 325 papers from well-known computer science, and natural language processing conferences and journals, and make an overview. Recently, large language models have shown strong model capacity on downstream tasks, which also reshaped medical dialog systems' foundation. Despite the alluring practical application value, current medical dialogue systems still suffer from problems. To this end, this paper lists the grand challenges of medical dialog systems, especially of large language models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HealthBranches: Synthesizing Clinically-Grounded Question Answering Datasets via Decision Pathways

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A semi-automated pipeline turns clinical decision trees into 4,063 medical Q&A pairs with explicit reasoning paths, and early LLM benchmarks show models improve when given those paths.

Pith tools