Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Rate-Distortion Analysis for Composite Sources Under Subsource-Dependent Fidelity Criteria

Information Theory · Submitted 20 May 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our analysis shows that CTC coding generally has performance loss relative to optimal coding, even if the classification is perfect.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2405.11818 (version 2)
Pith IDHQY6MARI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationH. Vincent Poor, Iickho Song, Jiakun Liu, Wenyi Zhang. "A Rate-Distortion Analysis for Composite Sources Under Subsource-Dependent Fidelity Criteria." arXiv:2405.11818 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/HQY6MARI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,243 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.50 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.43 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A composite source, consisting of multiple subsources and a memoryless switch, outputs one symbol at a time from the subsource selected by the switch. If some data should be encoded more accurately than other data from an information source, the composite source model is suitable because in this model different distortion constraints can be put on the subsources. In this context, we propose subsource-dependent fidelity criteria for composite sources and use them to formulate a rate-distortion problem. We solve the problem and obtain a single-letter expression for the rate-distortion function. Further rate-distortion analysis characterizes the performance of classify-then-compress (CTC) coding, which is frequently used in practice when subsource-dependent fidelity criteria are considered. Our analysis shows that CTC coding generally has performance loss relative to optimal coding, even if the classification is perfect. We also identify the cause of the performance loss, that is, class labels have to be reproduced in CTC coding. Last but not least, we show that the performance loss is negligible for asymptotically small distortion if CTC coding is appropriately designed and some mild conditions are satisfied.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A composite source, consisting of multiple subsources and a memoryless switch, outputs one symbol at a time from the subsource selected by the switch. background 0.99 0.08 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 If some data should be encoded more accurately than other data from an information source, the composite source model is suitable because in this model different distortion constraints can be put on the subsources. background 1.00 0.07 0.04 asserted 0.83
s2 In this context, we propose subsource-dependent fidelity criteria for composite sources and use them to formulate a rate-distortion problem. contribution 0.89 0.94 0.06 asserted 0.98
s3 We solve the problem and obtain a single-letter expression for the rate-distortion function. result 0.87 0.97 0.38 asserted 1.00
s4 Further rate-distortion analysis characterizes the performance of classify-then-compress (CTC) coding, which is frequently used in practice when subsource-dependent fidelity criteria are considered. contribution 0.87 0.85 0.07 asserted 0.90
s5 Our analysis shows that CTC coding generally has performance loss relative to optimal coding, even if the classification is perfect. result 1.00 0.94 0.32 asserted 0.99
s6 We also identify the cause of the performance loss, that is, class labels have to be reproduced in CTC coding. result 0.53 0.94 0.11 asserted 1.00
s7 Last but not least, we show that the performance loss is negligible for asymptotically small distortion if CTC coding is appropriately designed and some mild conditions are satisfied. result 0.99 0.95 0.26 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A composite source, consisting of multiple subsources and a memoryless switch, outputs one symbol at a time from the subsource selected by the switch. If some data should be encoded more accurately than other data from an information source, the composite source model is suitable because in this model different distortion constraints can be put on the subsources. In this context, we propose subsource-dependent fidelity criteria for composite sources and use them to formulate a rate-distortion problem. We solve the problem and obtain a single-letter expression for the rate-distortion function. Further rate-distortion analysis characterizes the performance of classify-then-compress (CTC) coding, which is frequently used in practice when subsource-dependent fidelity criteria are considered. Our analysis shows that CTC coding generally has performance loss relative to optimal coding, even if the classification is perfect. We also identify the cause of the performance loss, that is, class labels have to be reproduced in CTC coding. Last but not least, we show that the performance loss is negligible for asymptotically small distortion if CTC coding is appropriately designed and some mild conditions are satisfied.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.