REVIEW 7 cited by
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have showcased significant improvements in mathematics. However, traditional math benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective, falling short in providing a holistic assessment of the LLMs' math capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce MathBench, a new benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. The benchmark progresses through five distinct stages, from basic arithmetic to college mathematics, and is structured to evaluate models at various depths of knowledge. Each stage includes theoretical questions and application problems, allowing us to measure a model's mathematical proficiency and its ability to apply concepts in practical scenarios. MathBench aims to enhance the evaluation of LLMs' mathematical abilities, providing a nuanced view of their knowledge understanding levels and problem solving skills in a bilingual context. The project is released at https://github.com/open-compass/MathBench .
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection
ErrorRadar is a new benchmark of 2,500 multimodal K-12 math problems for MLLM error step identification and categorization, where GPT-4o trails human experts by ~10%.
-
DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy
DPrivBench shows that top LLMs handle basic differential privacy mechanisms but fail on advanced algorithms, exposing gaps in automated DP reasoning.
-
DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy
DPrivBench is a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs on differential privacy reasoning, with results showing good performance on textbook mechanisms but substantial failures on advanced algorithms.
-
MathFlow: Enhancing the Perceptual Flow of MLLMs for Visual Mathematical Problems
MathFlow decouples perception and inference stages in MLLMs for visual math, with a dedicated perception model delivering gains on the FlowVerse benchmark when paired with existing reasoners.
-
Revisiting a Pain in the Neck: A Semantic Reasoning Benchmark for Language Models
SemanticQA is a unified benchmark that reveals substantial performance gaps in language models on semantic reasoning tasks involving multiword expressions.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Number Theory: LLMs for Algorithm Generation and Ensemble Methods for Conjecture Verification
LLM reaches >=0.95 accuracy on 60 number theory problems with optimal hints; LightGBM classifier empirically supports Dirichlet conductor conjecture via zero features at 93.9% test accuracy for small q.
-
Revisiting a Pain in the Neck: A Semantic Reasoning Benchmark for Language Models
SemanticQA unifies prior multiword expression datasets into a benchmark that reveals substantial performance variation among language models on semantic reasoning tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.