Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

OLAPH: Improving Factuality in Biomedical Long-form Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12701 v3 pith:WQMIBJAB submitted 2024-05-21 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords factualityframeworkllmsmedicalolaphanswersclaimsdomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the medical domain, numerous scenarios necessitate the long-form generation ability of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, when addressing patients' questions, it is essential that the model's response conveys factual claims, highlighting the need for an automated method to evaluate those claims. Thus, we introduce MedLFQA, a benchmark dataset reconstructed using long-form question-answering datasets related to the biomedical domain. We use MedLFQA to facilitate a cost-effective automatic evaluations of factuality. We also propose OLAPH, a simple and novel framework that utilizes cost-effective and multifaceted automatic evaluation to construct a synthetic preference set and answers questions in our preferred manner. Our framework leads us to train LLMs step-by-step to reduce hallucinations and include crucial medical claims. We highlight that, even on evaluation metrics not used during training, LLMs trained with our OLAPH framework demonstrate significant performance improvement in factuality. Our findings reveal that a 7B LLM trained with our OLAPH framework can provide long answers comparable to the medical experts' answers in terms of factuality. We believe that our work could shed light on gauging the long-text generation ability of LLMs in the medical domain. Our code and datasets are available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Response Quality Assessment for Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Conditional Conformal Factuality

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Conformal-RAG applies conformal prediction with a retrieval-based relevance score to guarantee the factuality of retained sub-claims in RAG responses.

  2. Harnessing RLHF for Robust Unanswerability Recognition and Trustworthy Response Generation in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SALU, a multi-task fine-tuning and confidence-guided RLHF method, reduces hallucinated answers on unanswerable Chinese CIR questions to 1.3 percent on the authors' private dataset.

Pith tools