REVIEW 2 cited by
Constraints on Einstein-dilation-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and electric charge of compact binary systems from GW230529
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this work, we study the implications of GW230529 on gravity theories and the charge of black holes. The GW230529, which was initially released in O4a, is most likely neutron star-black hole (NSBH) mergers. We reanalyze the data from the GW230529 event to obtain bounds on the Einstein-dilation-Gauss-Bonnet (EdGB) gravity parameter $\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm EdGB}}$ and the electric charge of compact binary systems. The event places a $90\%$ credible upper bounds on $\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm EdGB}}$ of $\lesssim 0.298$ km. After including high order corrections of EdGB gravity, the bounds improve to $\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm EdGB}} \lesssim 0.260$ km. Analyses of GW230529 also yield a $90\%$ credible upper bounds on the combination of charge-to-mass ratio of the binary components $\zeta \lesssim 0.024$. The constraints are more stringent than those derived from previously observed single gravitational wave merger event.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Testing the nature of compact objects in the lower mass gap using gravitational wave observations
Simulated low-mass-gap boson star binaries are severely mis-measured when analyzed with black hole waveform models, but a model including both spin-induced quadrupole and tidal effects recovers the correct masses.
-
Extreme Compactness, Extreme Gravity: Higher-Derivative Corrections to ECOs
In Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity the ECO compactness scale shifts by order alpha divided by r0 squared, and in Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet gravity by order alpha squared divided by r0 to the fourth.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.