Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Safety Alignment for Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13581 v1 pith:RUMQ63XB submitted 2024-05-22 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords safetymodelsvisualalignmentlanguagellmsmodalitymodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Benefiting from the powerful capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), pre-trained visual encoder models connected to an LLMs can realize Vision Language Models (VLMs). However, existing research shows that the visual modality of VLMs is vulnerable, with attackers easily bypassing LLMs' safety alignment through visual modality features to launch attacks. To address this issue, we enhance the existing VLMs' visual modality safety alignment by adding safety modules, including a safety projector, safety tokens, and a safety head, through a two-stage training process, effectively improving the model's defense against risky images. For example, building upon the LLaVA-v1.5 model, we achieve a safety score of 8.26, surpassing the GPT-4V on the Red Teaming Visual Language Models (RTVLM) benchmark. Our method boasts ease of use, high flexibility, and strong controllability, and it enhances safety while having minimal impact on the model's general performance. Moreover, our alignment strategy also uncovers some possible risky content within commonly used open-source multimodal datasets. Our code will be open sourced after the anonymous review.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hate in Plain Sight: On the Risks of Moderating AI-Generated Hateful Illusions

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hateful optical illusions generated with Stable Diffusion and ControlNet evade current moderation classifiers (best accuracy 0.245) and vision-language models (best accuracy 0.102), with simple image transformations s...

  2. $PC^2$: Politically Controversial Content Generation via Jailbreaking Attacks on GPT-based Text-to-Image Models

    cs.CR 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PC2, a multilingual descriptive-rewriting attack, makes GPT-based text-to-image models generate politically controversial images of real public figures despite safety filters.

  3. Bridging the Gap in Vision Language Models in Identifying Unsafe Concepts Across Modalities

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision-language models consistently recognize unsafe content better from text than from images, and a simplified reinforcement learning fine-tune narrows that gap.

  4. BadVLA: Towards Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models via Objective-Decoupled Optimization

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage, objective-decoupled training method embeds visual backdoors into VLA robot policies, achieving near-100% trigger-induced task failure with minimal clean-performance loss in simulation.

  5. Hierarchical Safety Realignment: Lightweight Restoration of Safety in Pruned Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HSR restores safety in pruned vision-language models by selectively restoring safety-critical neurons inside the attention heads that matter most for safety.

  6. SafeCoT: Improving VLM Safety with Minimal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Training vision-language models to emit a short rule-based reasoning chain before refusing improves the safety-usefulness balance, with reported gains even at 100 training samples.

  7. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.

Pith tools