Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Interpretable and Editable Programmatic Tree Policies for Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14956 v1 pith:ZZNVVVW2 submitted 2024-05-23 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords learningpoliciesinterpretablemisalignmentsreinforcementtreeeditableinterpreter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep reinforcement learning agents are prone to goal misalignments. The black-box nature of their policies hinders the detection and correction of such misalignments, and the trust necessary for real-world deployment. So far, solutions learning interpretable policies are inefficient or require many human priors. We propose INTERPRETER, a fast distillation method producing INTerpretable Editable tRee Programs for ReinforcEmenT lEaRning. We empirically demonstrate that INTERPRETER compact tree programs match oracles across a diverse set of sequential decision tasks and evaluate the impact of our design choices on interpretability and performances. We show that our policies can be interpreted and edited to correct misalignments on Atari games and to explain real farming strategies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Black Box to Executable Logic: Explainable Reinforcement Learning through Prolog Expert Systems

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A trained PPO policy is distilled into an executable first-order Prolog decision list that, after exact-return expansion, can match or exceed the teacher, with certified return loss and an O(1/B) fidelity/resolution theory.

  2. A Survey of Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Targets, Methods and Needs

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of 250+ explainable-reinforcement-learning papers proposes a What/How taxonomy and reports that sequence-level explanations are rare (11 works) compared with policy-level (175) and action-level (89) ones.

Pith tools