Can Large Language Models Faithfully Express Their Intrinsic Uncertainty in Words?
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:UIAROYEXrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
We posit that large language models (LLMs) should be capable of expressing their intrinsic uncertainty in natural language. For example, if the LLM is equally likely to output two contradicting answers to the same question, then its generated response should reflect this uncertainty by hedging its answer (e.g., "I'm not sure, but I think..."). We formalize faithful response uncertainty based on the gap between the model's intrinsic confidence in the assertions it makes and the decisiveness by which they are conveyed. This example-level metric reliably indicates whether the model reflects its uncertainty, as it penalizes both excessive and insufficient hedging. We evaluate a variety of aligned LLMs at faithfully communicating uncertainty on several knowledge-intensive question answering tasks. Our results provide strong evidence that modern LLMs are poor at faithfully conveying their uncertainty, and that better alignment is necessary to improve their trustworthiness.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Not All Uncertainty Is Equal: How Uncertainty Granularity Shapes Human Verification in LLM-Assisted Decision Making
A between-subjects experiment (N=192) finds that token-level uncertainty increases agreement with LLM answers while relation-level uncertainty reduces external verification in medical decision tasks.
-
Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling
Introduces the Mechanism Plausibility Scale to distinguish generative sufficiency from mechanistic plausibility in LLM-based agent-based models.
-
Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs
A large-scale multilingual evaluation of LLM uncertainty estimation methods across 22 languages and 9 models finds that English reasoning closes the UE gap for low-resource languages and that optimal UE method choice ...
-
Hedging and Non-Affirmation: Quantifying LLM Alignment on Questions of Human Rights
LLMs exhibit identity-dependent hedging on human rights questions, with group identity as the strongest predictor among tested factors, and group steering mitigates the disparity.
-
Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling
Introduces the Mechanism Plausibility Scale, a four-level framework separating generative sufficiency from mechanistic plausibility in LLM-based agent-based models.
-
"I Don't Know" -- Towards Appropriate Trust with Certainty-Aware Retrieval Augmented Generation
CERTA adds relevance-based certainty estimation to RAG so LLMs can better signal uncertainty on non-objective questions, reducing overconfidence.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.