Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Stop! In the Name of Flaws: Disentangling Personal Names and Sociodemographic Attributes in NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17159 v2 pith:V3AXI7GZ submitted 2024-05-27 cs.CL cs.CYcs.HC

classification cs.CLcs.CYcs.HC
keywords namessociodemographiccharacteristicspersonalvalidityattributesethicallanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Personal names simultaneously differentiate individuals and categorize them in ways that are important in a given society. While the natural language processing community has thus associated personal names with sociodemographic characteristics in a variety of tasks, researchers have engaged to varying degrees with the established methodological problems in doing so. To guide future work that uses names and sociodemographic characteristics, we provide an overview of relevant research: first, we present an interdisciplinary background on names and naming. We then survey the issues inherent to associating names with sociodemographic attributes, covering problems of validity (e.g., systematic error, construct validity), as well as ethical concerns (e.g., harms, differential impact, cultural insensitivity). Finally, we provide guiding questions along with normative recommendations to avoid validity and ethical pitfalls when dealing with names and sociodemographic characteristics in natural language processing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Edge interventions can mitigate demographic and prestige disparities in the Computer Science coauthorship network

    physics.soc-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Women and minoritized-race CS faculty are less central in the coauthorship network, and a simulated single-edge collaboration with a top-ranked researcher can increase their centrality and predicted placement rank.

Pith tools