Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Assessing LLMs Suitability for Knowledge Graph Completion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17249 v2 pith:E5VJT5TZ submitted 2024-05-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords knowledgellmscompletiongraphevengraphspromptsresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work has shown the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve tasks related to Knowledge Graphs, such as Knowledge Graph Completion, even in Zero- or Few-Shot paradigms. However, they are known to hallucinate answers, or output results in a non-deterministic manner, thus leading to wrongly reasoned responses, even if they satisfy the user's demands. To highlight opportunities and challenges in knowledge graphs-related tasks, we experiment with three distinguished LLMs, namely Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct-v0.1, GPT-3.5-Turbo-0125 and GPT-4o, on Knowledge Graph Completion for static knowledge graphs, using prompts constructed following the TELeR taxonomy, in Zero- and One-Shot contexts, on a Task-Oriented Dialogue system use case. When evaluated using both strict and flexible metrics measurement manners, our results show that LLMs could be fit for such a task if prompts encapsulate sufficient information and relevant examples.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HyDRA: A Hybrid-Driven Reasoning Architecture for Verifiable Knowledge Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HyDRA, a contract-driven LLM pipeline for building ontologies and knowledge graphs, scored 42-62% accuracy on MedExQA biomedical QA while an ontology-free baseline scored 95-98%.

Pith tools