Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17382 v2 pith:D4BUKF6B submitted 2024-05-27 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords textsllmsalignedrewardmodelhumanhuman-writtenlgts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The remarkable capabilities and easy accessibility of large language models (LLMs) have significantly increased societal risks (e.g., fake news generation), necessitating the development of LLM-generated text (LGT) detection methods for safe usage. However, detecting LGTs is challenging due to the vast number of LLMs, making it impractical to account for each LLM individually; hence, it is crucial to identify the common characteristics shared by these models. In this paper, we draw attention to a common feature of recent powerful LLMs, namely the alignment training, i.e., training LLMs to generate human-preferable texts. Our key finding is that as these aligned LLMs are trained to maximize the human preferences, they generate texts with higher estimated preferences even than human-written texts; thus, such texts are easily detected by using the reward model (i.e., an LLM trained to model human preference distribution). Based on this finding, we propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model, namely (i) continual preference fine-tuning to make the reward model prefer aligned LGTs even further and (ii) reward modeling of Human/LLM mixed texts (a rephrased texts from human-written texts using aligned LLMs), which serves as a median preference text corpus between LGTs and human-written texts to learn the decision boundary better. We provide an extensive evaluation by considering six text domains across twelve aligned LLMs, where our method demonstrates state-of-the-art results. Code is available at https://github.com/hyunseoklee-ai/ReMoDetect.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tailored Truths: Optimizing LLM Persuasion with Personalization and Fabricated Statistics

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A small lab study found GPT-4o-mini debates using a combined personalization-plus-fabricated-stats strategy shifted opinions in 51% of trials versus 32% for static human arguments, an effect not clearly supported by s...

Pith tools