Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Instruct-MusicGen: Unlocking Text-to-Music Editing for Music Language Models via Instruction Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18386 v3 pith:URIKKG3P submitted 2024-05-28 cs.SD cs.AIcs.LGcs.MMeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.LGcs.MMeess.AS
keywords musiceditingmodelsaudioinstruct-musicgenlanguagemodelmusicgen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in text-to-music editing, which employ text queries to modify music (e.g.\ by changing its style or adjusting instrumental components), present unique challenges and opportunities for AI-assisted music creation. Previous approaches in this domain have been constrained by the necessity to train specific editing models from scratch, which is both resource-intensive and inefficient; other research uses large language models to predict edited music, resulting in imprecise audio reconstruction. To Combine the strengths and address these limitations, we introduce Instruct-MusicGen, a novel approach that finetunes a pretrained MusicGen model to efficiently follow editing instructions such as adding, removing, or separating stems. Our approach involves a modification of the original MusicGen architecture by incorporating a text fusion module and an audio fusion module, which allow the model to process instruction texts and audio inputs concurrently and yield the desired edited music. Remarkably, Instruct-MusicGen only introduces 8% new parameters to the original MusicGen model and only trains for 5K steps, yet it achieves superior performance across all tasks compared to existing baselines, and demonstrates performance comparable to the models trained for specific tasks. This advancement not only enhances the efficiency of text-to-music editing but also broadens the applicability of music language models in dynamic music production environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Recomposer: Event-roll-guided generative audio editing

    cs.SD 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An encoder-decoder transformer conditions on text actions and a time-aligned event roll to delete, insert, or enhance individual sound events in dense audio scenes.

  2. MuseControlLite: Multifunctional Music Generation with Lightweight Conditioners

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A lightweight adapter that adds rotary position embeddings to decoupled cross-attention enables efficient time-varying style control and audio inpainting/outpainting for text-to-music diffusion Transformers.

  3. SonicGauss: Position-Aware Physical Sound Synthesis for 3D Gaussian Representations

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A three-stage diffusion pipeline maps 3D Gaussian Splatting object representations to position-dependent impact sounds, trained first on text captions and then on real recordings.

  4. Workflow-Based Evaluation of Music Generation Systems

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single-producer workflow evaluation of eight music AI tools finds they work as idea and sound generators but not as complete composers, and proposes a reusable framework.

Pith tools