REVIEW 1 cited by
Classification analysis of transition-metal chalcogenides and oxides using quantum machine learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Quantum machine learning (QML) leverages the potential from machine learning to explore the subtle patterns in huge datasets of complex nature with quantum advantages. This exponentially reduces the time and resources necessary for computations. QML accelerates materials research with active screening of chemical space, identifying novel materials for practical applications and classifying structurally diverse materials given their measured properties. This study analyzes the performance of three efficient quantum machine learning algorithms viz., variational quantum eigen solver (VQE), quantum support vector machine (QSVM) and quantum neural networks (QNN) for the classification of transition metal chalcogenides and oxides (TMCs &TMOs). The analysis is performed on three datasets of different sizes containing 102, 192 and 350 materials with TMCs and TMOs labelled as +1 and -1 respectively. By employing feature selection, classical machine learning achieves 100% accuracy whereas QML achieves the highest performance of 99% and 98% for test and train data respectively on QSVC. This study establishes the competence of QML models in materials classification and explores the quantum circuits in terms of over-fitting using the circuit descriptors expressibility and entangling capability. In addition, the perspectives on QML in materials research with noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) devices is given.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Predicting Water Quality using Quantum Machine Learning: The Case of the Umgeni Catchment (U20A) Study Region
On a 32-point water quality dataset from Durban, a quantum support vector classifier reached 75% accuracy while a quantum neural network consistently failed to train.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.