Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CLIPLoss and Norm-Based Data Selection Methods for Multimodal Contrastive Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19547 v2 pith:YPN3ELP5 submitted 2024-05-29 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords datamethodsclipselectiondownstreammodeltasksalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data selection has emerged as a core issue for large-scale visual-language model pretaining (e.g., CLIP), particularly with noisy web-curated datasets. Three main data selection approaches are: (1) leveraging external non-CLIP models to aid data selection, (2) training new CLIP-style embedding models that are more effective at selecting high-quality data than the original OpenAI CLIP model, and (3) designing better metrics or strategies universally applicable to any CLIP embedding without requiring specific model properties (e.g., CLIPScore is one popular metric). While the first two approaches have been extensively studied, the third remains under-explored. In this paper, we advance the third approach by proposing two new methods. Firstly, instead of classical CLIP scores that only consider the alignment between two modalities from a single sample, we introduce surrogate-CLIPLoss (s-CLIPLoss), a CLIP loss-inspired method that adds the alignment between one sample and its contrastive pairs as an extra normalization term for better quality measurement. Secondly, when downstream tasks are known, we propose a new norm-based metric, NormSim, to measure the similarity between pretraining data and target data. We test our methods on the data selection benchmark, DataComp~\cite{gadre2023datacomp}. Compared to the best baseline using only OpenAI's CLIP-L/14, our methods achieve a 5.3\% improvement on ImageNet-1k and a 2.8\% improvement on 38 downstream evaluation tasks. Moreover, both s-CLIPLoss and NormSim are compatible with existing techniques. By combining our methods with the current best methods DFN and HYPE, we can boost average performance on downstream tasks by 0.9\%, achieving a new state-of-the-art on the DataComp-medium benchmark.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Active Data Curation Effectively Distills Large-Scale Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Selecting training data by a reference model's loss acts as an implicit distillation, and combining it with explicit distillation yields more FLOP-efficient vision-language models that beat prior SoTA on 27 benchmarks.

  2. Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weights

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A gradient alignment score against a reference model's weights selects and reweights training samples, improving data efficiency in image classification and CLIP pretraining.

  3. SCAN: Bootstrapping Contrastive Pre-training for Data Efficiency

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SCAN dynamically prunes and regrows training data during contrastive pre-training, matching full-data accuracy within about 1% on average while using 30-35% less data.

Pith tools