Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Harvard Undergraduate Survey on Generative AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00833 v2 pith:7SFYDGQI submitted 2024-06-02 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords studentshalfharvardgenerativealmostclassfindingprospects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How has generative AI impacted the experiences of college students? We study the influence of AI on the study habits, class choices, and career prospects of Harvard undergraduates (n=326), finding that almost 90% of students use generative AI. For roughly 25% of these students, AI has begun to substitute for attending office hours and completing required readings. Half of students are concerned that AI will negatively impact their job prospects, and over half of students wish that Harvard had more classes on the future impacts of AI. We also investigate students' outlook on the broader social implications of AI, finding that half of students are worried that AI will increase economic inequality, and 40% believe that extinction risk from AI should be treated as a global priority with the same urgency as pandemics and nuclear war. Around half of students who have taken a class on AI expect AI to exceed human capabilities on almost all tasks within 30 years. We make some recommendations to the Harvard community in light of these results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Assessing LLM Text Detection in Educational Contexts: Does Human Contribution Affect Detection?

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On a new educational benchmark with graded contribution levels, most AI text detectors confuse lightly AI-edited student essays with AI text and falter on harder AI-generated variants.

  2. Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI

    econ.GN 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Off-the-shelf generative AI access raises student knowledge-test scores by 0.27 SD immediately and one week later, with delayed unaided essay gains concentrated among students who use AI to explain concepts rather tha...

Pith tools