Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Are AI-Generated Text Detectors Robust to Adversarial Perturbations?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.01179 v2 pith:SFEUTZ2X submitted 2024-06-03 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords textadversarialai-generatedperturbationsrobustnessscrnaigtavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The widespread use of large language models (LLMs) has sparked concerns about the potential misuse of AI-generated text, as these models can produce content that closely resembles human-generated text. Current detectors for AI-generated text (AIGT) lack robustness against adversarial perturbations, with even minor changes in characters or words causing a reversal in distinguishing between human-created and AI-generated text. This paper investigates the robustness of existing AIGT detection methods and introduces a novel detector, the Siamese Calibrated Reconstruction Network (SCRN). The SCRN employs a reconstruction network to add and remove noise from text, extracting a semantic representation that is robust to local perturbations. We also propose a siamese calibration technique to train the model to make equally confidence predictions under different noise, which improves the model's robustness against adversarial perturbations. Experiments on four publicly available datasets show that the SCRN outperforms all baseline methods, achieving 6.5\%-18.25\% absolute accuracy improvement over the best baseline method under adversarial attacks. Moreover, it exhibits superior generalizability in cross-domain, cross-genre, and mixed-source scenarios. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/CarlanLark/Robust-AIGC-Detector}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MAGA-Bench: Machine-Augment-Generated Text via Alignment Detection Benchmark

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding human-alignment augmentation (roleplaying, BPO, self-refine, RLDF) to machine-generated text both fools existing detectors and improves the generalization of detectors fine-tuned on it.

  2. A Mathematical Theory of Discursive Networks

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A two-state Markov model of error propagation suggests that small amounts of cross-agent peer review can flip a network of fallible language models from a falsehood-dominant to a truth-dominant state.

Pith tools