Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

PrivacyRestore: Privacy-Preserving Inference in Large Language Models via Privacy Removal and Restoration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.01394 v5 pith:E5D2MQVK submitted 2024-06-03 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords privacyinferenceinformationprivacyrestoreprivaterestorationlargeduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The widespread usage of online Large Language Models (LLMs) inference services has raised significant privacy concerns about the potential exposure of private information in user inputs to malicious eavesdroppers. Existing privacy protection methods for LLMs suffer from either insufficient privacy protection, performance degradation, or large inference time overhead. To address these limitations, we propose PrivacyRestore, a plug-and-play method to protect the privacy of user inputs during LLM inference. The server first trains restoration vectors for each privacy span and then release to clients. Privacy span is defined as a contiguous sequence of tokens within a text that contain private information. The client then aggregate restoration vectors of all privacy spans in the input into a single meta restoration vector which is later sent to the server side along with the input without privacy spans.The private information is restored via activation steering during inference. Furthermore, we prove that PrivacyRestore inherently prevents the linear growth of the privacy budget.We create three datasets, covering medical and legal domains, to evaluate the effectiveness of privacy preserving methods. The experimental results show that PrivacyRestore effectively protects private information and maintain acceptable levels of performance and inference overhead.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Galaxy: A Cognition-Centered Framework for Proactive, Privacy-Preserving, and Self-Evolving LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Galaxy couples a cognitive tree structure with a meta-agent to make LLM assistants proactive, privacy-preserving, and self-evolving.

  2. Meta-Learning for Speeding Up Large Model Inference in Decentralized Environments

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MetaInf, an XGBoost meta-scheduler with LLM-derived embeddings, selects inference acceleration strategies with reported 89.8% accuracy and 1.55x average acceleration, beating baselines.

Pith tools