Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

SLTrain: a sparse plus low-rank approach for parameter and memory efficient pretraining

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02214 v2 pith:IO3GNSYN submitted 2024-06-04 cs.LG

SLTrain: a sparse plus low-rank approach for parameter and memory efficient pretraining

classification cs.LG
keywords low-rankpretrainingmemorysltrainsparselearningparameterswhen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across various tasks. However, training LLMs from scratch requires significant computational power and extensive memory capacity. Recent studies have explored low-rank structures on weights for efficient fine-tuning in terms of parameters and memory, either through low-rank adaptation or factorization. While effective for fine-tuning, low-rank structures are generally less suitable for pretraining because they restrict parameters to a low-dimensional subspace. In this work, we propose to parameterize the weights as a sum of low-rank and sparse matrices for pretraining, which we call SLTrain. The low-rank component is learned via matrix factorization, while for the sparse component, we employ a simple strategy of uniformly selecting the sparsity support at random and learning only the non-zero entries with the fixed support. While being simple, the random fixed-support sparse learning strategy significantly enhances pretraining when combined with low-rank learning. Our results show that SLTrain adds minimal extra parameters and memory costs compared to pretraining with low-rank parameterization, yet achieves substantially better performance, which is comparable to full-rank training. Remarkably, when combined with quantization and per-layer updates, SLTrain can reduce memory requirements by up to 73% when pretraining the LLaMA 7B model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Perplexity: A Geometric and Spectral Study of Low-Rank Pre-Training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Low-rank pre-training methods converge to geometrically and spectrally distinct basins from full-rank training and from each other, even at similar validation perplexity.

  2. Beyond Perplexity: A Geometric and Spectral Study of Low-Rank Pre-Training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Low-rank pre-training methods converge to geometrically and spectrally distinct basins and show diverging activations compared to full-rank training at 60M-350M scales.

  3. CR-Net: Scaling Parameter-Efficient Training with Cross-Layer Low-Rank Structure

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CR-Net uses cross-layer low-rank residuals in a dual-path network plus specialized recomputation to outperform prior low-rank methods on 60M-7B model pre-training while using less compute and memory.

  4. Super-Tuning: From Activation-Aware Pruning to Sparse Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Wanda- or magnitude-ordered fixed sparse supports, alone or hybridized with LoRA under a matched budget, can outperform tested PEFT baselines on Math17K arithmetic fine-tuning.