Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Label-wise Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02354 v1 pith:MTN5IMVA submitted 2024-06-04 cs.LG stat.ML

Label-wise Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords uncertaintymeasureslabel-wisequantificationaleatoricallowsepistemicaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present a novel approach to uncertainty quantification in classification tasks based on label-wise decomposition of uncertainty measures. This label-wise perspective allows uncertainty to be quantified at the individual class level, thereby improving cost-sensitive decision-making and helping understand the sources of uncertainty. Furthermore, it allows to define total, aleatoric, and epistemic uncertainty on the basis of non-categorical measures such as variance, going beyond common entropy-based measures. In particular, variance-based measures address some of the limitations associated with established methods that have recently been discussed in the literature. We show that our proposed measures adhere to a number of desirable properties. Through empirical evaluation on a variety of benchmark data sets -- including applications in the medical domain where accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial -- we establish the effectiveness of label-wise uncertainty quantification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned

    cs.CY 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    The paper presents the TÜV AUSTRIA Trusted AI audit catalog, a statistical framework based on the Stochastic Application Domain Definition, minimum performance requirements, and independent-sample testing for certifyi...