REVIEW 3 cited by
The Scandinavian Embedding Benchmarks: Comprehensive Assessment of Multilingual and Monolingual Text Embedding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The evaluation of English text embeddings has transitioned from evaluating a handful of datasets to broad coverage across many tasks through benchmarks such as MTEB. However, this is not the case for multilingual text embeddings due to a lack of available benchmarks. To address this problem, we introduce the Scandinavian Embedding Benchmark (SEB). SEB is a comprehensive framework that enables text embedding evaluation for Scandinavian languages across 24 tasks, 10 subtasks, and 4 task categories. Building on SEB, we evaluate more than 26 models, uncovering significant performance disparities between public and commercial solutions not previously captured by MTEB. We open-source SEB and integrate it with MTEB, thus bridging the text embedding evaluation gap for Scandinavian languages.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Benchmarking pre-trained text embedding models in aligning built asset information
A new public benchmark of 24 text embedding models on six built asset datasets shows uneven performance and that general-purpose benchmarks fail to predict domain-specific results.
-
BEIR-NL: Zero-shot Information Retrieval Benchmark for the Dutch Language
BEIR-NL is a Dutch-translated version of the BEIR benchmark with evaluations showing BM25 remains competitive against multilingual dense models.
-
A Comparative Study of Text Retrieval Models on DaReCzech
A benchmark on the Czech DaReCzech dataset finds Gemma2 most accurate, Contriever least accurate, and SPLADE/PLAID the best efficiency-quality trade-off.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.