Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Mitigate Position Bias in Large Language Models via Scaling a Single Dimension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02536 v3 pith:G7RWSXJR submitted 2024-06-04 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords positionbiasmodelshiddenstatesattentiondimensionlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in various real-world scenarios due to their excellent generalization capabilities and robust generative abilities. However, they exhibit position bias, also known as "lost in the middle", a phenomenon that is especially pronounced in long-context scenarios, which indicates the placement of the key information in different positions of a prompt can significantly affect accuracy. This paper first explores the micro-level manifestations of position bias, concluding that attention weights are a micro-level expression of position bias. It further identifies that, in addition to position embeddings, causal attention mask also contributes to position bias by creating position-specific hidden states. Based on these insights, we propose a method to mitigate position bias by scaling this positional hidden states. Experiments on the NaturalQuestions Multi-document QA, KV retrieval, LongBench and timeline reorder tasks, using various models including RoPE models, context windowextended models, and Alibi models, demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of our approach. Our method can improve performance by up to 15.2% by modifying just one dimension of hidden states. Our code is available at https://aka.ms/PositionalHidden.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards Order Fairness: Mitigating LLMs Order Sensitivity through Dual Group Advantage Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DGAO uses reinforcement learning to optimize LLMs for both accuracy and order stability by balancing intra-group accuracy advantages and inter-group stability advantages.

  2. MARS-RA: Rank Aggregation for Credit Assignment via Multimodal Comparisons in Embodied Multi-Agent Cooperation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Credit assignment via LMM pairwise comparisons plus Bradley–Terry rank aggregation and potential-based shaping improves cooperative MARL under sparse rewards and dynamic agent counts.

  3. Semantically Similar, Logically Distinct: Diagnosing the Semantic-Answerability Gap in Table RAG

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a new sibling-table benchmark, dense retrievers find the right table group but identify the uniquely answerable table at near-chance rates; cross-encoder reranking lifts top-1 from 18.2% to 57.4%.

  4. Logit-Attention Divergence: Mitigating Position Bias in Multi-Image Retrieval via Attention-Guided Calibration

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free attention-guided debiasing framework mitigates position bias in MLLM multi-image retrieval by exploiting the observed mismatch between biased logits and aligned attention maps, yielding over 40% accura...

  5. Saliency-R1: Enforcing Interpretable and Faithful Vision-language Reasoning via Saliency-map Alignment Reward

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Saliency-R1 uses a novel saliency map technique and GRPO with human bounding-box overlap as reward to improve VLM reasoning faithfulness and interpretability.

  6. The Chameleon Nature of LLMs: Quantifying Multi-Turn Stance Instability in Search-Enabled Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On 1,180 web-enabled multi-turn conversations, GPT-4o-mini, Llama-4-Maverick, and Gemini-2.5-Flash all changed stance frequently (chameleon scores 0.39–0.51), with little effect from temperature.

Pith tools