Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Teaching-Assistant-in-the-Loop: Improving Knowledge Distillation from Imperfect Teacher Models in Low-Budget Scenarios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.05322 v1 pith:YEX7AFDQ submitted 2024-06-08 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords studentteacherframeworkimperfectmodelsoutputssignalconfidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

There is increasing interest in distilling task-specific knowledge from large language models (LLM) to smaller student models. Nonetheless, LLM distillation presents a dual challenge: 1) there is a high cost associated with querying the teacher LLM, such as GPT-4, for gathering an ample number of demonstrations; 2) the teacher LLM might provide imperfect outputs with a negative impact on the student's learning process. To enhance sample efficiency within resource-constrained, imperfect teacher scenarios, we propose a three-component framework leveraging three signal types. The first signal is the student's self-consistency (consistency of student multiple outputs), which is a proxy of the student's confidence. Specifically, we introduce a ``teaching assistant'' (TA) model to assess the uncertainty of both the student's and the teacher's outputs via confidence scoring, which serves as another two signals for student training. Furthermore, we propose a two-stage training schema to first warm up the student with a small proportion of data to better utilize student's signal. Experiments have shown the superiority of our proposed framework for four complex reasoning tasks. On average, our proposed two-stage framework brings a relative improvement of up to 20.79% compared to fine-tuning without any signals across datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating Spurious Correlations Between Question and Answer via Chain-of-Thought Correctness Perception Distillation

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoPeD trains smaller language models with a correction task for wrong rationales and loss-based sample weighting, improving accuracy and rationale faithfulness on several reasoning benchmarks.

  2. Semantically-Aware Rewards for Open-Ended R1 Training in Free-Form Generation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PrefBERT, a 150M-parameter reward model trained on human quality ratings, outperforms ROUGE-L and BERTScore as a GRPO reward signal for open-ended long-form generation.

  3. MergeME: Model Merging Techniques for Homogeneous and Heterogeneous MoEs

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Merging specialized LLMs into a MoE can be improved by replacing averaging with Dare/Ties merging and by using perplexity-based routing, while heterogeneous experts can be merged with projectors and a sequence-level router.

Pith tools