Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LINGOLY: A Benchmark of Olympiad-Level Linguistic Reasoning Puzzles in Low-Resource and Extinct Languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.06196 v3 pith:LR7DZBKR submitted 2024-06-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords benchmarkmodelslanguagelanguageslingolylinguisticlow-resourceproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present the LingOly benchmark, a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models. Using challenging Linguistic Olympiad puzzles, we evaluate (i) capabilities for in-context identification and generalisation of linguistic patterns in very low-resource or extinct languages, and (ii) abilities to follow complex task instructions. The LingOly benchmark covers more than 90 mostly low-resource languages, minimising issues of data contamination, and contains 1,133 problems across 6 formats and 5 levels of human difficulty. We assess performance with both direct accuracy and comparison to a no-context baseline to penalise memorisation. Scores from 11 state-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate the benchmark to be challenging, and models perform poorly on the higher difficulty problems. On harder problems, even the top model only achieved 38.7% accuracy, a 24.7% improvement over the no-context baseline. Large closed models typically outperform open models, and in general, the higher resource the language, the better the scores. These results indicate, in absence of memorisation, true multi-step out-of-domain reasoning remains a challenge for current language models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KoBALT: Korean Benchmark For Advanced Linguistic Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    KoBALT, an expert-crafted 700-question Korean linguistic benchmark, finds that even the best LLM answers only 61% correctly, with human preference ratings correlating moderately with benchmark accuracy.

  2. Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of logical reasoning in large language models that organizes benchmarks, evaluations, and enhancement methods around formal and symbolic logic.

Pith tools