REVIEW 5 cited by
Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the emergence of advanced reasoning models like OpenAI o3 and DeepSeek-R1, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities. However, their ability to perform rigorous logical reasoning remains an open question. This survey synthesizes recent advancements in logical reasoning within LLMs, a critical area of AI research. It outlines the scope of logical reasoning in LLMs, its theoretical foundations, and the benchmarks used to evaluate reasoning proficiency. We analyze existing capabilities across different reasoning paradigms - deductive, inductive, abductive, and analogical - and assess strategies to enhance reasoning performance, including data-centric tuning, reinforcement learning, decoding strategies, and neuro-symbolic approaches. The review concludes with future directions, emphasizing the need for further exploration to strengthen logical reasoning in AI systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMs
ARGUS measures hallucination and omission in free-form video captions using LLM-based entailment and temporal alignment, finding that even the best video-LLM still produces roughly 40% hallucinated content.
-
Deductive Logic in Language Models: Horizontal vs Vertical Reasoning
A 2-layer, single-head attention-only transformer learns to perform multi-step logical deduction through induction-head circuits for rule completion, chaining, and final decision.
-
MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs
A new 1,188-question multimodal benchmark covering deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning shows that leading MLLMs score around 60% and are especially weak at abductive reasoning.
-
DAFMSVC: One-Shot Singing Voice Conversion with Dual Attention Mechanism and Flow Matching
DAFMSVC swaps source SSL features for similar target features and adds dual cross-attention plus flow matching to improve one-shot singing voice conversion.
-
Are Large Language Models Capable of Deep Relational Reasoning? Insights from DeepSeek-R1 and Benchmark Comparisons
DeepSeek-R1 outperforms GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 on family tree and graph reasoning benchmarks at sizes 10 and 20, but all models collapse at size 40.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.