Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

HalluDial: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Automatic Dialogue-Level Hallucination Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.07070 v1 pith:M4GPELTL submitted 2024-06-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords hallucinationhalludialevaluationdialogue-levelhallucinationsllmsautomaticbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), achieving remarkable performance across diverse tasks and enabling widespread real-world applications. However, LLMs are prone to hallucination, generating content that either conflicts with established knowledge or is unfaithful to the original sources. Existing hallucination benchmarks primarily focus on sentence- or passage-level hallucination detection, neglecting dialogue-level evaluation, hallucination localization, and rationale provision. They also predominantly target factuality hallucinations while underestimating faithfulness hallucinations, often relying on labor-intensive or non-specialized evaluators. To address these limitations, we propose HalluDial, the first comprehensive large-scale benchmark for automatic dialogue-level hallucination evaluation. HalluDial encompasses both spontaneous and induced hallucination scenarios, covering factuality and faithfulness hallucinations. The benchmark includes 4,094 dialogues with a total of 146,856 samples. Leveraging HalluDial, we conduct a comprehensive meta-evaluation of LLMs' hallucination evaluation capabilities in information-seeking dialogues and introduce a specialized judge language model, HalluJudge. The high data quality of HalluDial enables HalluJudge to achieve superior or competitive performance in hallucination evaluation, facilitating the automatic assessment of dialogue-level hallucinations in LLMs and providing valuable insights into this phenomenon. The dataset and the code are available at https://github.com/FlagOpen/HalluDial.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ReasoningTrack: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Long-term Vision-Language Tracking

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    FAITH masks numbers in real 10-K reports to test when financial LLMs hallucinate, and finds even top models err on 10-20% of multi-step calculations.

  2. MIRAGE-Bench: LLM Agent is Hallucinating and Where to Find Them

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark with a three-way hallucination taxonomy, snapshot-based test cases, and an LLM judge shows LLM agents hallucinate at over 30% of risky decision points, with open and closed models closer than expected.

  3. FECT: Factuality Evaluation of Interpretive AI-Generated Claims in Contact Center Conversation Transcripts

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark and 3D decomposition paradigm for factuality evaluation of interpretive claims about contact center conversations, with best LLM-judge F1 of 0.86.

Pith tools