Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.07348 v3 pith:KV6MJEQU submitted 2024-06-11 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords documentsquerydr-ragaccuracygenerationllmsrelevanceretrieval-augmented
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently demonstrated the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the knowledge-intensive tasks such as Question-Answering (QA). RAG expands the query context by incorporating external knowledge bases to enhance the response accuracy. However, it would be inefficient to access LLMs multiple times for each query and unreliable to retrieve all the relevant documents by a single query. We have found that even though there is low relevance between some critical documents and query, it is possible to retrieve the remaining documents by combining parts of the documents with the query. To mine the relevance, a two-stage retrieval framework called Dynamic-Relevant Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DR-RAG) is proposed to improve document retrieval recall and the accuracy of answers while maintaining efficiency. Additionally, a compact classifier is applied to two different selection strategies to determine the contribution of the retrieved documents to answering the query and retrieve the relatively relevant documents. Meanwhile, DR-RAG call the LLMs only once, which significantly improves the efficiency of the experiment. The experimental results on multi-hop QA datasets show that DR-RAG can significantly improve the accuracy of the answers and achieve new progress in QA systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. R3G: A Reasoning-Retrieval-Reranking Framework for Vision-Centric Answer Generation

    cs.CV 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    R3G improves vision-centric VQA by generating a reasoning plan before retrieval and reranking candidate images with an MLLM judge on relevance, target match, and answerability.

  2. AILQA: Evaluating AI-Driven Legal Question Answering Systems for the Indian Legal System

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    RAG with top-3 chunk retrieval lifts smaller LLMs on Indian legal QA (Llama2-70B: 45.7% to 51.7% on AIBE) but often hurts large models, and under the study's own rating protocol some AI answers outscored the reference...

  3. UrbanMind: Towards Urban General Intelligence via Tool-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Multilevel Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper introduces UrbanMind, a tool-enhanced RAG framework with a multilevel optimization formulation for continual adaptation in urban AI, but offers only qualitative prototype results.

Pith tools