Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Constraining Wind-Driven Accretion Onto Gaia BH3 With Chandra

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 11 Jun 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Because of the inferred low rates, accretion did not significantly contribute to black hole growth over the system's lifetime.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2406.07602 (version 2)
Pith IDXNA2UF22, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFabio Pacucci, G\"unther Hasinger, Nico Cappelluti. "Constraining Wind-Driven Accretion Onto Gaia BH3 With Chandra." arXiv:2406.07602 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/XNA2UF22
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,412 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.63 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.37 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Gaia BH3 is the most massive known stellar-origin black hole in the Milky Way, with a mass $M_\bullet \approx 33 \, \rm M_\odot$. Detected from Gaia's astrometry, this black hole is in the mass range of those observed via gravitational waves, whose nature is still highly debated. Hosted in a binary system with a companion giant star that is too far away for Roche-lobe mass transfer, this black hole could nonetheless accrete at low levels due to wind-driven mass-loss from its companion star, thus accreting in advection-dominated accretion flow, or ADAF, mode. Using stellar wind models, we constrain its Eddington ratio in the range $10^{-9} < f_{\rm Edd} < 10^{-7}$, corresponding to radiative efficiencies $5\times10^{-5} < \epsilon < 10^{-3}$, compatible with radiatively inefficient accretion modes. Chandra ACIS-S observed this object and obtained the most sensitive upper bound of its [2-10] keV flux: $F_X < 3.25 \times 10^{-15} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1} \, cm^{-2}$ at $90\%$ confidence level corresponding to $L_{[2-10]}< 2.10 \times 10^{29} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$. Using ADAF emission models, we constrained its accretion rate to $f_{\rm Edd}< 4.91 \times 10^{-7}$ at the apastron, in agreement with our theoretical estimate. At the periastron, we expect fluxes $\sim 50$ times larger. Because of the inferred low rates, accretion did not significantly contribute to black hole growth over the system's lifetime. Detecting the electromagnetic emission from Gaia BH3 will be fundamental to informing stellar wind and accretion disk models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Gaia BH3 is the most massive known stellar-origin black hole in the Milky Way, with a mass $M_\bullet \approx 33 \, \rm M_\odot$. background 0.99 0.13 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Detected from Gaia's astrometry, this black hole is in the mass range of those observed via gravitational waves, whose nature is still highly debated. background 0.98 0.10 0.03 asserted 0.96
s2 Hosted in a binary system with a companion giant star that is too far away for Roche-lobe mass transfer, this black hole could nonetheless accrete at low levels due to wind-driven mass-loss from its companion star, thus accreting in advection-dominated accretion flow, or ADAF, mode. background 0.96 0.11 0.07 hedged possibility 1.00
s3 Using stellar wind models, we constrain its Eddington ratio in the range $10^{-9} < f_{\rm Edd} < 10^{-7}$, corresponding to radiative efficiencies $5\times10^{-5} < \epsilon < 10^{-3}$, compatible with radiatively inefficient accretion modes. result 0.95 0.88 0.24 asserted 0.97
s4 Chandra ACIS-S observed this object and obtained the most sensitive upper bound of its [2-10] keV flux: $F_X < 3.25 \times 10^{-15} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1} \, cm^{-2}$ at $90\%$ confidence level corresponding to $L_{[2-10]}< 2.10 \times 10^{29} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$. result 0.98 0.94 0.14 asserted 1.00
s5 Using ADAF emission models, we constrained its accretion rate to $f_{\rm Edd}< 4.91 \times 10^{-7}$ at the apastron, in agreement with our theoretical estimate. result 0.98 0.94 0.19 asserted 1.00
s6 At the periastron, we expect fluxes $\sim 50$ times larger. result 0.79 0.71 0.04 hedged possibility 0.47
s7 Because of the inferred low rates, accretion did not significantly contribute to black hole growth over the system's lifetime. interpretation 0.98 0.76 0.40 asserted 0.99
s8 Detecting the electromagnetic emission from Gaia BH3 will be fundamental to informing stellar wind and accretion disk models. future work 0.82 0.08 0.11 asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.68.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Gaia BH3 is the most massive known stellar-origin black hole in the Milky Way, with a mass $M_\bullet \approx 33 \, \rm M_\odot$. Detected from Gaia's astrometry, this black hole is in the mass range of those observed via gravitational waves, whose nature is still highly debated. Hosted in a binary system with a companion giant star that is too far away for Roche-lobe mass transfer, this black hole could nonetheless accrete at low levels due to wind-driven mass-loss from its companion star, thus accreting in advection-dominated accretion flow, or ADAF, mode. Using stellar wind models, we constrain its Eddington ratio in the range $10^{-9} < f_{\rm Edd} < 10^{-7}$, corresponding to radiative efficiencies $5\times10^{-5} < \epsilon < 10^{-3}$, compatible with radiatively inefficient accretion modes. Chandra ACIS-S observed this object and obtained the most sensitive upper bound of its [2-10] keV flux: $F_X < 3.25 \times 10^{-15} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1} \, cm^{-2}$ at $90\%$ confidence level corresponding to $L_{[2-10]}< 2.10 \times 10^{29} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$. Using ADAF emission models, we constrained its accretion rate to $f_{\rm Edd}< 4.91 \times 10^{-7}$ at the apastron, in agreement with our theoretical estimate. At the periastron, we expect fluxes $\sim 50$ times larger. Because of the inferred low rates, accretion did not significantly contribute to black hole growth over the system's lifetime. Detecting the electromagnetic emission from Gaia BH3 will be fundamental to informing stellar wind and accretion disk models.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites as support 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.