Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MultiPragEval: Multilingual Pragmatic Evaluation of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.07736 v3 pith:DAVQIDWC submitted 2024-06-11 cs.CL

MultiPragEval: Multilingual Pragmatic Evaluation of Large Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords languagemodelsllmsmultipragevalpragmaticassessmentcapabilitiesevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) expand, it becomes increasingly important to evaluate them beyond basic knowledge assessment, focusing on higher-level language understanding. This study introduces MultiPragEval, the first multilingual pragmatic evaluation of LLMs, designed for English, German, Korean, and Chinese. Comprising 1200 question units categorized according to Grice's Cooperative Principle and its four conversational maxims, MultiPragEval enables an in-depth assessment of LLMs' contextual awareness and their ability to infer implied meanings. Our findings demonstrate that Claude3-Opus significantly outperforms other models in all tested languages, establishing a state-of-the-art in the field. Among open-source models, Solar-10.7B and Qwen1.5-14B emerge as strong competitors. By analyzing pragmatic inference, we provide valuable insights into the capabilities essential for advanced language comprehension in AI systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Talking with Oompa Loompas: A novel framework for evaluating linguistic acquisition of LLM agents

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    LLM agents (GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-2.5-flash, Claude-3.5-haiku) cannot learn an enumerated synthetic language through feedback within 100 turns, despite the task's grammar being fully specified in the system prompt.