REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial Evasion Attack Efficiency against Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are valuable for text classification, but their vulnerabilities must not be disregarded. They lack robustness against adversarial examples, so it is pertinent to understand the impacts of different types of perturbations, and assess if those attacks could be replicated by common users with a small amount of perturbations and a small number of queries to a deployed LLM. This work presents an analysis of the effectiveness, efficiency, and practicality of three different types of adversarial attacks against five different LLMs in a sentiment classification task. The obtained results demonstrated the very distinct impacts of the word-level and character-level attacks. The word attacks were more effective, but the character and more constrained attacks were more practical and required a reduced number of perturbations and queries. These differences need to be considered during the development of adversarial defense strategies to train more robust LLMs for intelligent text classification applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Adversarial Text Generation with Dynamic Contextual Perturbation
An NLP attack that swaps gradient-important words with synonyms while minimizing BERT embedding distance is reported to beat PWWS and BERT-Attack on accuracy drop, perturbation rate, and queries, but the paper gives n...
-
A Survey: Towards Privacy and Security in Mobile Large Language Models
A survey of privacy and security challenges for mobile large language models, summarizing known attack types and defenses without introducing new results.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.