Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.09870 v3 pith:EZP4UJCS submitted 2024-06-14 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords graphalgorithmsdataimbalancedlearningigl-benchbenchmarkcomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep graph learning has gained grand popularity over the past years due to its versatility and success in representing graph data across a wide range of domains. However, the pervasive issue of imbalanced graph data distributions, where certain parts exhibit disproportionally abundant data while others remain sparse, undermines the efficacy of conventional graph learning algorithms, leading to biased outcomes. To address this challenge, Imbalanced Graph Learning (IGL) has garnered substantial attention, enabling more balanced data distributions and better task performance. Despite the proliferation of IGL algorithms, the absence of consistent experimental protocols and fair performance comparisons pose a significant barrier to comprehending advancements in this field. To bridge this gap, we introduce IGL-Bench, a foundational comprehensive benchmark for imbalanced graph learning, embarking on 16 diverse graph datasets and 24 distinct IGL algorithms with uniform data processing and splitting strategies. Specifically, IGL-Bench systematically investigates state-of-the-art IGL algorithms in terms of effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency on node-level and graph-level tasks, with the scope of class-imbalance and topology-imbalance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of IGL algorithms on various imbalanced conditions, offering insights and opportunities in the IGL field. Further, we have developed an open-sourced and unified package to facilitate reproducible evaluation and inspire further innovative research, which is available at https://github.com/RingBDStack/IGL-Bench.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. OpenRTAG: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Text-Attributed Graph Learning under Data Quality Degradation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OpenRTAG is a benchmark that organizes text-attributed-graph data-quality issues into a 3x3 taxonomy (text/structure/label by sparsity/noise/imbalance) and evaluates model robustness across nine datasets and three tasks.

  2. A Comprehensive Survey on Imbalanced Data Learning

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey and benchmark that groups imbalanced data learning methods into data re-balancing, feature representation, training strategy, and ensemble learning.

Pith tools