Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

VideoGUI: A Benchmark for GUI Automation from Instructional Videos

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10227 v1 pith:TVT562IC submitted 2024-06-14 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords tasksvideoguiactionbenchmarkplanningassistantsatomicautomation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graphical User Interface (GUI) automation holds significant promise for enhancing human productivity by assisting with computer tasks. Existing task formulations primarily focus on simple tasks that can be specified by a single, language-only instruction, such as "Insert a new slide." In this work, we introduce VideoGUI, a novel multi-modal benchmark designed to evaluate GUI assistants on visual-centric GUI tasks. Sourced from high-quality web instructional videos, our benchmark focuses on tasks involving professional and novel software (e.g., Adobe Photoshop or Stable Diffusion WebUI) and complex activities (e.g., video editing). VideoGUI evaluates GUI assistants through a hierarchical process, allowing for identification of the specific levels at which they may fail: (i) high-level planning: reconstruct procedural subtasks from visual conditions without language descriptions; (ii) middle-level planning: generate sequences of precise action narrations based on visual state (i.e., screenshot) and goals; (iii) atomic action execution: perform specific actions such as accurately clicking designated elements. For each level, we design evaluation metrics across individual dimensions to provide clear signals, such as individual performance in clicking, dragging, typing, and scrolling for atomic action execution. Our evaluation on VideoGUI reveals that even the SoTA large multimodal model GPT4o performs poorly on visual-centric GUI tasks, especially for high-level planning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VideoMolmo: Spatio-Temporal Grounding Meets Pointing

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A video language model that conditions each frame on earlier frames via a temporal attention module, predicts text-requested object points, and uses SAM2-based bidirectional mask fusion to outperform prior models on v...

  2. PresentAgent: Multimodal Agent for Presentation Video Generation

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    PresentAgent chains LLM segmentation, slide rendering, TTS, and ffmpeg to turn documents into narrated presentation videos, but the human-level claim rests on five documents and an unvalidated VLM judge.

Pith tools