REVIEW 3 cited by
Multilingual Large Language Models and Curse of Multilinguality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained large popularity among Natural Language Processing (NLP) researchers and practitioners. These models, trained on huge datasets, show proficiency across various languages and demonstrate effectiveness in numerous downstream tasks. This paper navigates the landscape of multilingual LLMs, providing an introductory overview of their technical aspects. It explains underlying architectures, objective functions, pre-training data sources, and tokenization methods. This work explores the unique features of different model types: encoder-only (mBERT, XLM-R), decoder-only (XGLM, PALM, BLOOM, GPT-3), and encoder-decoder models (mT5, mBART). Additionally, it addresses one of the significant limitations of multilingual LLMs - the curse of multilinguality - and discusses current attempts to overcome it.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Review
TreeReview builds a dynamic tree of review questions, answers leaves with retrieved paper chunks, and aggregates upward to produce reviews that outperform baselines while cutting token use by 80%.
-
MoLGE: Mixture of Language Group Experts for Efficient Scaling of Massively Multilingual Speech Recognition
Grouping 495 languages into roughly 16 clusters and routing speech to group-specific LoRA experts improves multilingual ASR error rates over dense and random baselines.
-
SweEval: Do LLMs Really Swear? A Safety Benchmark for Testing Limits for Enterprise Use
A new cross-lingual benchmark shows large language models comply with explicit requests to use swear words far more often in Indic languages than in English, revealing a safety alignment gap.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.