REVIEW 8 cited by
A Survey of AIOps for Failure Management in the Era of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey of AIOps for Failure Management in the Era of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
As software systems grow increasingly intricate, Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) methods have been widely used in software system failure management to ensure the high availability and reliability of large-scale distributed software systems. However, these methods still face several challenges, such as lack of cross-platform generality and cross-task flexibility. Fortunately, recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) can significantly address these challenges, and many approaches have already been proposed to explore this field. However, there is currently no comprehensive survey that discusses the differences between LLM-based AIOps and traditional AIOps methods. Therefore, this paper presents a comprehensive survey of AIOps technology for failure management in the LLM era. It includes a detailed definition of AIOps tasks for failure management, the data sources for AIOps, and the LLM-based approaches adopted for AIOps. Additionally, this survey explores the AIOps subtasks, the specific LLM-based approaches suitable for different AIOps subtasks, and the challenges and future directions of the domain, aiming to further its development and application.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Can Language Models Go Beyond Coding? Assessing the Capability of Language Models to Build Real-World Systems
Build-bench is the first architecture-aware benchmark that evaluates LLMs on repairing cross-ISA build failures via iterative tool-augmented reasoning, with the best model reaching 63.19% success.
-
UModel: An Agent-Ready Observability Data Modeling Method at Scale
UModel provides an object-centric ontological model for observability data and U-SPL query interface, improving root cause localization precision by 8% on the AIOps 2025 Challenge dataset with production deployment at...
-
TeleCom-Bench: How Far Are Large Language Models from Industrial Telecommunication Applications?
TeleCom-Bench reveals LLMs reach 90% on telecom intent and entity tasks but drop to 30% on solution generation and root cause analysis in live network scenarios.
-
MILM: Large Language Models for Multimodal Irregular Time Series with Informative Sampling
MILM fine-tunes LLMs on XML-encoded multimodal irregular time series via a two-stage process that exploits informative sampling patterns to achieve top performance on EHR classification datasets.
-
PropLLM: Propagation-Aware Scene Reconstruction for Network Fault Diagnosis
PropLLM combines hop-by-hop scene reconstruction with LLMs for network fault diagnosis, reporting 3.9% and 4.7% accuracy gains plus 50.8% hallucination reduction on real datasets.
-
Bian Que: An Agentic Framework with Flexible Skill Arrangement for Online System Operations
Bian Que deploys an agentic system with flexible skills and self-evolution on a major e-commerce search engine, cutting alerts by 75%, reaching 80% root-cause accuracy, and halving resolution time.
-
Bian Que: An Agentic Framework with Flexible Skill Arrangement for Online System Operations
Bian Que is an agentic framework using a unified operational paradigm, flexible Skill Arrangement, and self-evolving mechanism to automate O&M tasks, achieving 75% alert reduction and over 50% MTTR cut in production d...
-
REFLEX: Reference-Free Evaluation of Log Summarization via Large Language Model Judgment
REFLEX is a reference-free LLM-based evaluation metric for log summarization that assesses quality on relevance, informativeness, and coherence without gold references or human annotations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.