Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Do Not Design, Learn: A Trainable Scoring Function for Uncertainty Estimation in Generative LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11278 v3 pith:3SBZPNAM submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords scoringfunctionprobabilitiesuncertaintycomplexdependenciesestimationexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty estimation (UE) of generative large language models (LLMs) is crucial for evaluating the reliability of generated sequences. A significant subset of UE methods utilize token probabilities to assess uncertainty, aggregating multiple token probabilities into a single UE score using a scoring function. Existing scoring functions for probability-based UE, such as length-normalized scoring and semantic contribution-based weighting, are designed to solve certain aspects of the problem but exhibit limitations, including the inability to handle biased probabilities and complex semantic dependencies between tokens. To address these issues, in this work, we propose Learnable Response Scoring (LARS) function, a novel scoring function that leverages supervised data to capture complex dependencies between tokens and probabilities, thereby producing more reliable and calibrated response scores in computing the uncertainty of LLM generations. Our comprehensive experiments across question-answering and arithmetical reasoning tasks with various datasets demonstrate that LARS significantly outperforms existing scoring functions, achieving improvements of up to 16\% AUROC score.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Un-considering Contextual Information: Assessing LLMs' Understanding of Indexical Elements

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 1,600-question English benchmark shows LLMs interpret 'I' almost perfectly while struggling with 'you', 'here', and 'tomorrow', with quotation affecting each indexical differently.

  2. Improving the Calibration of Confidence Scores in Text Generation Using the Output Distribution's Characteristics

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two probability-only confidence metrics, a top-to-kth beam ratio and a tail-thinness score, improve quality correlation for BART and Flan-T5 on several summarization, translation, and QA datasets.

  3. Towards Harmonized Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CUE combines a supervised correctness classifier with existing LLM uncertainty scores to improve indication, balance, and calibration, reporting AUROC and ECE gains across models and datasets.

Pith tools