Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bias in Text Embedding Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12138 v1 pith:XXIRI5UL submitted 2024-06-17 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelsembeddingtextgenderedbiasprofessionsassociationbiased
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text embedding is becoming an increasingly popular AI methodology, especially among businesses, yet the potential of text embedding models to be biased is not well understood. This paper examines the degree to which a selection of popular text embedding models are biased, particularly along gendered dimensions. More specifically, this paper studies the degree to which these models associate a list of given professions with gendered terms. The analysis reveals that text embedding models are prone to gendered biases but in varying ways. Although there are certain inter-model commonalities, for instance, greater association of professions like nurse, homemaker, and socialite with female identifiers, and greater association of professions like CEO, manager, and boss with male identifiers, not all models make the same gendered associations for each occupation. Furthermore, the magnitude and directionality of bias can also vary on a model-by-model basis and depend on the particular words models are prompted with. This paper demonstrates that gender bias afflicts text embedding models and suggests that businesses using this technology need to be mindful of the specific dimensions of this problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maintaining MTEB: Towards Long Term Usability and Reproducibility of Embedding Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The MTEB maintainers document their infrastructure for versioning and validating benchmark components, plus a zero-shot score that flags models trained on benchmark tasks.

Pith tools