Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

More Efficient Randomized Exploration for Reinforcement Learning via Approximate Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12241 v1 pith:EM4ZYOEE submitted 2024-06-18 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords samplingalgorithmsapproximateexplorationdeepregretbaselinesbetter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Thompson sampling (TS) is one of the most popular exploration techniques in reinforcement learning (RL). However, most TS algorithms with theoretical guarantees are difficult to implement and not generalizable to Deep RL. While the emerging approximate sampling-based exploration schemes are promising, most existing algorithms are specific to linear Markov Decision Processes (MDP) with suboptimal regret bounds, or only use the most basic samplers such as Langevin Monte Carlo. In this work, we propose an algorithmic framework that incorporates different approximate sampling methods with the recently proposed Feel-Good Thompson Sampling (FGTS) approach (Zhang, 2022; Dann et al., 2021), which was previously known to be computationally intractable in general. When applied to linear MDPs, our regret analysis yields the best known dependency of regret on dimensionality, surpassing existing randomized algorithms. Additionally, we provide explicit sampling complexity for each employed sampler. Empirically, we show that in tasks where deep exploration is necessary, our proposed algorithms that combine FGTS and approximate sampling perform significantly better compared to other strong baselines. On several challenging games from the Atari 57 suite, our algorithms achieve performance that is either better than or on par with other strong baselines from the deep RL literature.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Provably avoiding over-optimization in Direct Preference Optimization without knowing the data distribution

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    PEPO uses pessimistic ensembling of DPO policies on data subsets to achieve single-policy concentrability sample bounds and avoid over-optimization in tabular settings.

  2. Provably avoiding over-optimization in Direct Preference Optimization without knowing the data distribution

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    PEPO is a single-step pessimistic ensemble algorithm for direct preference optimization that provably avoids over-optimization by depending only on single-policy concentrability without knowing the data distribution o...

Pith tools