Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Retrieval Meets Reasoning: Dynamic In-Context Editing for Long-Text Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12331 v1 pith:5GZRHRAO submitted 2024-06-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoningllmscontextseditinginformationmethodcontextdynamic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current Large Language Models (LLMs) face inherent limitations due to their pre-defined context lengths, which impede their capacity for multi-hop reasoning within extensive textual contexts. While existing techniques like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have attempted to bridge this gap by sourcing external information, they fall short when direct answers are not readily available. We introduce a novel approach that re-imagines information retrieval through dynamic in-context editing, inspired by recent breakthroughs in knowledge editing. By treating lengthy contexts as malleable external knowledge, our method interactively gathers and integrates relevant information, thereby enabling LLMs to perform sophisticated reasoning steps. Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively empowers context-limited LLMs, such as Llama2, to engage in multi-hop reasoning with improved performance, which outperforms state-of-the-art context window extrapolation methods and even compares favorably to more advanced commercial long-context models. Our interactive method not only enhances reasoning capabilities but also mitigates the associated training and computational costs, making it a pragmatic solution for enhancing LLMs' reasoning within expansive contexts.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DocMEdit: Towards Document-Level Model Editing

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    DocMEdit, a dataset of nearly 38,000 Wikipedia article updates, shows that existing model editing methods achieve low accuracy and cause large side effects on document-level editing tasks.

  2. Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey organizing RAG-reasoning systems into three stages: reasoning-enhanced RAG, RAG-enhanced reasoning, and synergized agentic RAG-reasoning.

Pith tools