Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QA

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14394 v1 pith:MRBP2DQG submitted 2024-06-20 cs.CL

SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QA

classification cs.CL
keywords financialdocumentsevaluationgenerationabilitycontextdatadataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The financial domain frequently deals with large numbers of long documents that are essential for daily operations. Significant effort is put towards automating financial data analysis. However, a persistent challenge, not limited to the finance domain, is the scarcity of datasets that accurately reflect real-world tasks for model evaluation. Existing datasets are often constrained by size, context, or relevance to practical applications. Moreover, LLMs are currently trained on trillions of tokens of text, limiting access to novel data or documents that models have not encountered during training for unbiased evaluation. We propose SEC-QA, a continuous dataset generation framework with two key features: 1) the semi-automatic generation of Question-Answer (QA) pairs spanning multiple long context financial documents, which better represent real-world financial scenarios; 2) the ability to continually refresh the dataset using the most recent public document collections, not yet ingested by LLMs. Our experiments show that current retrieval augmented generation methods systematically fail to answer these challenging multi-document questions. In response, we introduce a QA system based on program-of-thought that improves the ability to perform complex information retrieval and quantitative reasoning pipelines, thereby increasing QA accuracy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MetaGraph uses ontology-guided LLM extraction to build knowledge graphs from 681 papers on GenAI in financial NLP, identifying three distinct phases of development from 2022 to 2025.

  2. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    Using LLM extraction on 681 papers, the authors build a public knowledge graph showing financial NLP moved from LLM adoption to limitation-aware, modular system design between 2022 and 2025.

  3. LLM-Guided Planning for Multi-hop Reasoning over Multimodal Nuclear Regulatory Documents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLM planning agent with dynamic KG state achieves 81.5% accuracy on 200 multi-hop questions from NuScale FSAR documents, outperforming non-planning RAG baselines by up to 38pp.

  4. MimirRAG: A Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Financial Data Retrieval with Metadata Integration

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MimirRAG, a multi-agent RAG framework with metadata integration and table-aware chunking, reaches 89.3% accuracy on FinanceBench and outperforms prior baselines for financial document retrieval.

  5. Bridging Language Models and Financial Analysis

    q-fin.ST 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A survey synthesizing recent LLM research and assessing its applicability to financial data analysis.