Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Why LLMs Are Bad at Synthetic Table Generation (and what to do about it)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14541 v3 pith:NBQXGMFI submitted 2024-06-20 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords syntheticdatagenerationllmsfine-tuningtableadvancedas-is
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Synthetic data generation is integral to ML pipelines, e.g., to augment training data, replace sensitive information, and even to power advanced platforms like DeepSeek. While LLMs fine-tuned for synthetic data generation are gaining traction, synthetic table generation -- a critical data type in business and science -- remains under-explored compared to text and image synthesis. This paper shows that LLMs, whether used as-is or after traditional fine-tuning, are inadequate for generating synthetic tables. Their autoregressive nature, combined with random order permutation during fine-tuning, hampers the modeling of functional dependencies and prevents capturing conditional mixtures of distributions essential for real-world constraints. We demonstrate that making LLMs permutation-aware can mitigate these issues.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LAB-Tab: LLM-Augmented Bayesian Network Adaptation for Few-Shot Tabular Generation

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A source-trained Bayesian network, augmented with LLM-proposed edges and calibrated by PPO, generates synthetic tabular data that outperforms six baselines in six ACS distribution-shift scenarios.

  2. A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A metric-oriented survey that classifies intrinsic quality and trustworthiness metrics for LLM-generated data across six modalities and documents systematic evaluation gaps in the current literature.

  3. The Prompt is Mightier than the Example

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Injecting domain knowledge into prompts can substitute for many in-context examples in LLM-based synthetic tabular data generation, cutting required example counts by 40-90%.

Pith tools