Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14852 v2 pith:5TYUCBMY submitted 2024-06-21 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords modelsspatiallanguagereasoningvisualcompetitivedespitehuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks and domains. Despite this promise, spatial understanding and reasoning -- a fundamental component of human cognition -- remains under-explored. We propose SpatialEval, a novel benchmark that covers diverse aspects of spatial reasoning such as relationship understanding, navigation, and counting. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of competitive language and vision-language models. Our findings reveal several counter-intuitive insights that have been overlooked in the literature: (1) Spatial reasoning poses significant challenges where competitive models can fall behind random guessing; (2) Despite additional visual input, VLMs often under-perform compared to their LLM counterparts; (3) When both textual and visual information is available, multi-modal language models become less reliant on visual information if sufficient textual clues are provided. Additionally, we demonstrate that leveraging redundancy between vision and text can significantly enhance model performance. We hope our study will inform the development of multimodal models to improve spatial intelligence and further close the gap with human intelligence.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Synthetic Visual Genome

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A GPT-4V/GPT-4o pipeline for completing and refining scene graph annotations yields a dense synthetic dataset that, after instruction tuning, gives a 3B model strong relationship understanding and grounding results.

  2. Understanding Space Is Rocket Science -- Only Top Reasoning Models Can Solve Spatial Understanding Tasks

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new contrastive real-image benchmark shows most vision-language models fail spatial relation tasks, while chain-of-thought reasoning models approach human-level accuracy.

  3. 3D-Generalist: Self-Improving Vision-Language-Action Models for Crafting 3D Worlds

    cs.GR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-improving vision-language-model policy iteratively crafts 3D environments from text, and renderings of those environments serve as effective synthetic pretraining data for vision models.

  4. LogiPlan: A Structured Benchmark for Logical Planning and Relational Reasoning in LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LogiPlan introduces a three-task benchmark with controllable graph complexity, showing that although reasoning models excel at plan generation, all models degrade sharply on cycle detection and deep comparison questions.

Pith tools